Cases 1 - 10 of 47
Robbins v. Conecuh County, Alabama et al
as 1:2023cv00349
Plaintiff:
Nakita Robbins
Defendant:
Conecuh County, Alabama, Randy Brock, James Ward and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Luckey v. Jackson et al
as 1:2023cv00236
Plaintiff:
Tyran Luckey
Defendant:
Health Jackson, Richard Hetrick, Melissa Floyd and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Wiggins et al v. James Ward et al
as 1:2023cv00226
Plaintiff:
Brandi Wiggins and Sameria Straughn
Defendant:
James Ward, Randy Brock and Antonio Smith
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2022cv00114
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
The City of Gulf Shores, Alabama v. Amerisourcebergen Drug Corporation et al
as 1:2022cv00102
Plaintiff:
The City of Gulf Shores, Alabama
Defendant:
Amerisourcebergen Drug Corporation, Cardinal Health, Inc., McKesson Corporation and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961 Racketeering (RICO) Act
Pickett v. Ivey et al
as 1:2021cv00212
Defendant:
Jefferson Dunn, Kay Ivey, Dwayne Spurlock and others
Plaintiff:
Joe Ranger Pickett
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2021cv00090
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e
Purvis v. Escambia County Sheriff's Office et al
as 1:2020cv00456
Defendant:
Escambia County Sheriff's Office, Cody Hiers, James Ward and others
Plaintiff:
James Lonnie Purvis
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
Steele et al v. Pfizer, Inc. et al
as 1:2020cv00451
Defendant:
Warner-Lambert Company LLC, Pharmacia, LLC, Parke, Davis & Company LLC and others
Plaintiff:
Judith Steele, Mary Ward and Elizabeth Yancey
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Ward v. Saul
as 2:2019cv01039
Defendant:
Andrew Saul
Plaintiff:
Bernal Ward
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
