Cases 11 - 20 of 332
Thurman v. Higgins et al
as 4:2023cv01085
Plaintiff:
Mark Thurman
Defendant:
Eric Higgins, Randy Morgan, Holmes and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hopkins v. Higgins et al
as 4:2023cv00999
Plaintiff:
James Lewis Hopkins
Defendant:
Eric Higgins, Holmes, D Green and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Wing v. Greene County Detention Center et al
as 3:2023cv00218
Plaintiff:
Jayson David Wing
Defendant:
US Marshals Service, Greene County Detention Center, Gina Duncan and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Green v. Branham et al
as 4:2023cv00976
Plaintiff:
Christopher Green
Defendant:
Curry Branham, Mixon, Pierce and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Green v. Jackson et al
as 2:2023cv00193
Plaintiff:
Michael R Green and Michael Ray Green
Defendant:
Moses Jackson, III, M Richardson, Taylor and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Greene v. Hendrix et al
as 2:2023cv00101
Plaintiff:
Jamel Ewing Greene
Defendant:
Dewayne Hendrix, Department of Veterans Affairs, FCI Forrest City Compound Complex and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Sanchez v. Greene County Detention Center
as 3:2023cv00080
Plaintiff:
Jonathan Taber Sanchez
Defendant:
Greene County Detention Center
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Greene v. Department of Veterans Affairs
as 2:2023cv00073
Plaintiff:
Jamel Ewing Greene
Defendant:
Department of Veterans Affairs
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
Green v. Walker
as 3:2023cv00072
Plaintiff:
Anthony M Green
Defendant:
Walker
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Greene v. Hendrix
as 2:2023cv00053
Plaintiff:
Jamel Ewing Greene
Defendant:
John M McHugh and Dewayne Hendrix
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
