Cases 41 - 50 of 1,328
Elmore v. Shipman et al
as 4:2023cv01138
Plaintiff:
Jeffrey Elmore
Defendant:
James Shipman, Mariece Culclager, Dexter Payne and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Boyd v. Payne et al
as 2:2023cv00228
Plaintiff:
Michael L Boyd
Defendant:
Dexter Payne, Jackson, Tiffany M Williams and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Mayfield v. Wright et al
as 4:2023cv01081
Plaintiff:
William Mayfield
Defendant:
Rodney Wright, Gilliam and Griffin
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Valentinis-Dee v. Hendrex et al
as 2:2023cv00223
Plaintiff:
James Valentinis-Dee
Defendant:
Dewayne Hendrex, Vanessa Williams, Andrews and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Mayfield v. Parsons et al
as 4:2023cv01050
Plaintiff:
William Mayfield
Defendant:
Parsons, Gilliam, Doe and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Williams v. Carter et al
as 3:2023cv00226
Plaintiff:
Bryan Williams
Defendant:
BJ Carter, Regina Hindman, James Brown and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Couch v. Taylor et al
as 4:2023cv01009
Plaintiff:
Justin Hunter Couch
Defendant:
M Taylor, D White, L Williams and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Sealed 5 v. USA
as 4:2023cv00948
Petitioner:
Eric Deshon Williams
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Jones v. Budnik et al
as 2:2023cv00207
Plaintiff:
Charles Edward Jones, Sr
Defendant:
Christopher Budnik, William Freeman, Thomas Rolland and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Parker v. Matlock et al
as 3:2023cv00197
Plaintiff:
Zachary Ryan Parker
Defendant:
Micheal Matlock, Flossey Lane, Joseph McCorkly and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
