Cases 1 - 10 of 468
Keith v. Arkansas, State of et al
as 4:2024cv00503
Plaintiff:
Anthony Wayne Keith
Defendant:
Arkansas, State of, Michelle Gray and Dexter Payne
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Settles v. Arkansas, State of
as 4:2024cv00492
Plaintiff:
Quinton Settles
Defendant:
Arkansas, State of
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Fairchild v. Arkansas, State of
as 4:2024cv00465
Plaintiff:
Joseph Levell Fairchild
Defendant:
Arkansas, State of
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hamner v. Arkansas, State of et al
as 4:2024cv00430
Plaintiff:
Charles Hamner
Defendant:
Arkansas, State of, Arkansas Department of Correction, Dexter Payne and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Johnson v. Arkansas, State of
as 4:2024cv00403
Plaintiff:
Amber Johnson
Defendant:
Arkansas, State of
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
Pitts v. Payne et al
as 4:2024cv00338
Plaintiff:
Kenneth Ray Pitts
Defendant:
Dexter Payne and Arkansas, State of
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Bobbitt v. United States Marshal Service et al
as 4:2024cv00293
Plaintiff:
Christopher Mason Bobbitt
Defendant:
US Marshals, USA, PCRDF and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
Lambert v. Payne
as 3:2024cv00050
Plaintiff:
Dorletha Lambert
Defendant:
Arkansas, State of and Dexter Payne
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Hopkins v. Arkansas, State of
as 4:2024cv00266
Plaintiff:
Charles Hopkins
Defendant:
Arkansas, State of and Arkansas Department of Corrections
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Broady v. Arkansas, State of
as 4:2024cv00254
Plaintiff:
Daryl M Broady
Defendant:
Arkansas, State of
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
