Cases 101 - 110 of 553
Jones v. Payne et al
as 4:2020cv01287
Defendant:
Dexter Payne, Dennis Ugbaja, Jeremy Andrews and others
Plaintiff:
Kelei T Jones
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Kimbrel v. Ryles et al
as 4:2020cv01216
Plaintiff:
Andrew Cody Kimbrel
Defendant:
John Randall, Tim Ryles, T Collins and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Israel v. Harris et al
as 2:2020cv00193
Defendant:
Andrews, Paul Harris, Doe and others
Plaintiff:
CessanKha Jahish Israel
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Andrews v. Bowers
as 3:2020cv00270
Defendant:
Keith Bowers
Plaintiff:
Bobby Ray Andrews
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Everett v. Richard et al
as 3:2020cv00220
Defendant:
Dexter Payne, Brian Sights, Ricketts and others
Plaintiff:
Christopher Everett
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Gilbert v. Dycus et al
as 2:2019cv00135
Defendant:
Wendy Kelly, James Dycus and Jeremy Andrews
Plaintiff:
Stewart Gilbert
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Neal v. Arkansas, State of et al
as 3:2020cv00200
Defendant:
Mark Counts, Serena Martin, Arkansas Supreme Court and others
Plaintiff:
Andrew C Neal, Jr
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Johnson v. Kelley et al
as 4:2020cv00806
Defendant:
Byron Brown and Wendy Kelley
Plaintiff:
Michael Andrew Johnson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Neal v. Arkansas Supreme Court et al
as 4:2020cv00863
Defendant:
Oswego County Family Court, Does United States 2nd Eastern District; Mayor, Chief of Police and Officers Hardy, AR; Sheriff, Chief Deputy and Jail Administrator etc. Sharp County, Randolph County Circuit Court and others
Plaintiff:
Andrew C Neal, Jr II
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Neal v. Arkansas, State of et al
as 4:2020cv00935
Defendant:
Sharp County Sheriff Department, Mary E Johnson-Rodriguez, Betty Monette and others
Plaintiff:
Andrew C Neal, Jr II
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
