Cases 21 - 30 of 490
Wright v. Cogbill et al
as 4:2023cv00896
Plaintiff:
James Adam Wright, Jr
Defendant:
Cogbill, Gean Sieger, Leroy Martin and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
U-Haul Co of Arkansas v. Hyatt et al
as 4:2023cv00828
Plaintiff:
U-Haul Co of Arkansas
Defendant:
William Hyatt, Cameron Mutual Insurance Company, Santoshi Krupa LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1335 Interpleader Action
Clark v. Admin et al
as 3:2023cv00171
Plaintiff:
Verna Clark
Defendant:
Tiger Admin, Tyler Martin and Doe
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Cross v. Martin et al
as 4:2023cv00710
Plaintiff:
Patrick Cross
Defendant:
Leroy Martin, Jerry Maness and Does Miss Jean, Jailer, Officer ID 0266, Columbia County Sheriff's Department; Arresting Officer, Magnolia Police Department
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Buford v. Brown et al
as 4:2023cv00707
Plaintiff:
Stephen Louis Shermond Buford
Defendant:
Rodney D Brown and John Martin
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2023cv00667
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2023cv00665
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Brewer v. Maness et al
as 4:2023cv00627
Plaintiff:
Rodrick Dion Brewer
Defendant:
Jerry Maness, Gean Seiger, Leroy Martin and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Smith v. Martin
as 4:2023cv00588
Plaintiff:
Trevor Smith
Defendant:
Leroy Martin
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Dismuke v. Martin
as 4:2023cv00590
Plaintiff:
Deandre M Dismuke
Defendant:
Leroy Martin
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
