Cases 51 - 60 of 639
Dillard v. Tanner et al
as 2:2022cv00102
Plaintiff:
John Wayne Dillard, III
Defendant:
Dawn Lee Tanner, Dexter Payne, G Lay and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Wilson v. Brockman et al
as 4:2022cv00505
Plaintiff:
Danny James Wilson
Defendant:
K Brockman, Scott, Hoffman and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Badger v. Randle et al
as 2:2022cv00087
Plaintiff:
Craytonia Badger
Defendant:
K Randle, Marcus Etherly and Davis
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Terry v. Randle et al
as 2:2022cv00084
Plaintiff:
Jarell D Terry
Defendant:
K Randle, M Richardson, G Lay and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Dube v. Bo Jones Trucking LLC et al
as 4:2022cv00406
Plaintiff:
Altair Dube
Defendant:
Bo Jones Trucking LLC and Stanley K Offil
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Tort/Motor Vehicle (P.I.)
Simmons v. Gas Express LLC
as 4:2022cv00401
Plaintiff:
Megan Simmons
Defendant:
Gas Express LLC doing business as Circle K doing business as Champs Chicken
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Personal Injury
Badger v. Jackson et al
as 2:2022cv00071
Plaintiff:
Craytonia Badger
Defendant:
Anthony Jackson, Gaylon Lay, Dexter Payne and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Martin v. Lay et al
as 2:2022cv00070
Plaintiff:
Lawrence E Martin
Defendant:
Gaylon Lay, K Randle, Sophia Henry and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Williams v. Washington et al
as 4:2022cv00327
Plaintiff:
Thelma Williams
Defendant:
Washington, Todd Ball, James Gibson and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Austin v. Gober et al
as 4:2022cv00300
Plaintiff:
Donna K Austin
Defendant:
Mark Gober and Susan Potts
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
