Cases 1 - 10 of 649
Whitt v. Arkansas, State of et al
as 4:2024cv00961
Defendant:
Hope Runion, R Gunner Delay, Arkansas, State of and others
Plaintiff:
Gregory K Whitt
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Cummings v. Well Path Medical LLC et al
as 4:2024cv00931
Defendant:
Nicole Reddick, Kayla Hargrave, Aundrea F Culcager and others
Plaintiff:
Joshua Dontae Cummings
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jones v. McCradic et al
as 2:2024cv00191
Defendant:
Elkens, K Creppel, Michael Synder and others
Plaintiff:
Jay Jones
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2024cv00898
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Amicus Curiae:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Rattler v. Barden et al
as 4:2024cv00870
Defendant:
K Berryman, Roosevelt G Barden, Evans and others
Plaintiff:
Emonie Drashawn Rattler
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2024cv00714
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Age)
Jones v. Walker et al
as 4:2024cv00649
Defendant:
Aubrey K Walker, D Ballard and Rice
Plaintiff:
Lynn D Jones
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Nance v. Payne et al
as 4:2024cv00612
Defendant:
Dexter Payne, Kayla Emsweller and K Emsweller
Plaintiff:
Laquincy Nance
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Shoemake v. Fulton County
as 4:2024cv00603
Plaintiff:
Dustin K Shoemake
Defendant:
Fulton County
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Yancey v. Payne et al
as 2:2024cv00114
Defendant:
K Matthews, Dexter Payne, T Allison and others
Plaintiff:
John B Yancey
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
