Cases 31 - 40 of 192
Brooks v. Rogers
as 5:2021cv05211
Plaintiff:
Jerome Kendall Brooks
Defendant:
Detective Shane Rogers
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Brooks v. Rogers et al
as 5:2021cv05210
Plaintiff:
Jerome Kendall Brooks
Defendant:
Supervisor Shane Rogers, Detective Mark Harmony, Detective Matthew Duvall and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Clendening v. Day et al
as 3:2021cv03070
Plaintiff:
Joseph Ruben Clendening
Defendant:
Jason Day, Sergeant Rebecca Spillman, Jailer Tessa Foster and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Rogers, Jr. v. Social Security Administration Commissioner
as 2:2021cv02150
Plaintiff:
Roy W. Rogers, Jr.
Defendant:
Social Security Administration Commissioner and Office of Regional
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Dunn v. Social Security Administration Commissioner
as 2:2021cv02103
Plaintiff:
Roger D. Dunn
Defendant:
Social Security Administration Commissioner
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Patrick v. Lookingbill et al
as 3:2021cv03036
Defendant:
Lieutenant Herren, Captain Lookingbill, Corey Spain and others
Plaintiff:
Brannon Cody Atkins Patrick
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Rogers v. Social Security Administration Commissioner
as 2:2021cv02065
Plaintiff:
Kimberly Rogers
Defendant:
Social Security Administration Commissioner
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Rogers v. Benton County Sheriff's Office et al
as 5:2021cv05015
Plaintiff:
Charles Clarence Rogers, Jr.
Defendant:
Detective Matthew D. Cline, Benton County Sheriff's Office, Deputy Steven J. Scott and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Clark v. Rogers et al
as 3:2020cv03074
Plaintiff:
James Brian Clark
Defendant:
Tony Rogers and Tony Pirani
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Clark v. Rogers et al
as 3:2020cv03067
Plaintiff:
James Brian Clark
Defendant:
Tony Rogers and Tony Pirani
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
