Cases 41 - 50 of 59
Whitehead v. Clinton et al
as 4:2011cv04031
Plaintiff:
David Louis Whitehead
Defendant:
William Jefferson Clinton, George W. Bush, Barrack H. Obama and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Garland v. Fred's Stores of Tennessee
as 4:2011cv04017
Plaintiff:
Carol Garland
Defendant:
Fred's Stores of Tennessee
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Dockery v. Miller County Sheriff's Department et al
as 4:2010cv04070
Plaintiff:
Yvonne Dockery
Defendant:
Miller County Sheriff's Department, Texarkana Arkansas Police Dept, Garland, City of and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Dockery v. Garland, City of
as 4:2010cv04071
Plaintiff:
Yvonne Dockery
Defendant:
Garland, City of
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
King v. Garland County Department of Human Services
as 6:2009cv06096
Plaintiff:
Charles Edward King
Defendant:
Garland County Department of Human Services
Cause Of Action: 07 U.S.C. § 2022 Food Stamp Program: Review of Admin. Decision
SDI Hot Springs, LLC v. B & F Engineering, Inc. et al
as 6:2009cv06084
Plaintiff:
SDI Hot Springs, LLC
Defendant:
B & F Engineering, Inc. and Garland County Fair and Livestock Show Association, Inc
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Other Contract
Gautreaux v. Steed et al
as 6:2009cv06081
Plaintiff:
Robert Hardin Gautreaux
Defendant:
Captain Steed, Deputy McKinney, Deputy Huffman and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Baucom v. Garland Co., Arkansas
as 6:2009cv06065
Plaintiff:
Robert Baucom
Defendant:
Garland Co., Arkansas
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Rambeau v. Garland County Detention Center
as 6:2009cv06049
Plaintiff:
John Rambeau
Defendant:
Garland County Detention Center
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hill v. Garland County Detention Center
as 6:2008cv06098
Plaintiff:
James H. Hill, Jr.
Defendant:
Garland County Detention Center
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
