Cases 81 - 88 of 88
Hortica-Florists' Mutual Insurance Company v. Pittman Nursery Corporation et al
as 1:2007cv01119
Plaintiff:
Hortica-Florists' Mutual Insurance Company
Defendant:
Pittman Nursery Corporation, Donna Sue Pittman King, Pittman Properties Limited Partnership #1 and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201 Declaratory Judgement (Insurance)
Williams v. Gordon et al
as 2:2007cv02121
Plaintiff:
Thomas H Williams
Defendant:
C. O. Gordon , Thomas Travis, Devane and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Ingle et al v. Jenkins et al
as 2:2007cv02114
Plaintiff:
Dale Ingle and Ramona Tedford
Defendant:
Donald Jenkins, Donald Jenkins, Van Buren, Arkansas, City of and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Burchard v. Social Security Administration Commissioner
as 5:2007cv05120
Plaintiff:
Bill D. Burchard
Defendant:
Social Security Administration Commissioner
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Feazell v. Pittman Properties Limited Partnership #1 et al
as 1:2007cv01053
Plaintiff:
Bill Feazell
Defendant:
Pittman Properties Limited Partnership #1, D&M Pittman, Incorporated and Dawood Aydani
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1121 Trademark Infringement
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 6:2007cv06032
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990
Aguilar et al v. Pilgrims Pride Corporation
as 1:2007cv01040
Plaintiff:
Salvador Aguilar, Anthony Atkins, Marilyn Bailey and others
Defendant:
Pilgrims Pride Corporation
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Griffin et al v. Crossett School District et al
as 1:2007cv01015
Plaintiff:
Willie Griffin, II, Dorothy Griffin and Willie Griffin, III
Defendant:
Crossett School District, Janice Warren, Jim Lucas and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
