Cases 1 - 10 of 55
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2024cv05183
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12117 Americans with Disabilities-Employment
Dansby v. Butler et al
as 4:2024cv04082
Defendant:
Jail Administrator Gina Butler, Judge Tom Cooper, Prosecutor Tisha Martin and others
Plaintiff:
Joseph Alexander Dansby, Sr
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Dansby v. Warner et al
as 4:2024cv04046
Defendant:
Correctional Officer Paige Betts and Correctional Officer Otto Warner
Plaintiff:
Joseph Alexander Dansby
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Dansby v. State of Arkansas
as 4:2024cv04032
Petitioner:
Joseph Alexander Dansby, Sr
Respondent:
State of Arkansas
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2024cv05047
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Ford v. Alexander Youth Services Center
as 5:2024cv05041
Plaintiff:
DeMarian Tyrell Ford
Defendant:
Alexander Youth Services Center
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Wilcox v. Alexander et al
as 3:2024cv03008
Plaintiff:
Bobby Dwayne Wilcox
Defendant:
Gregg L. Alexander and DOES 1 through 10, inclusive
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2024cv05008
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2023cv05193
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Sex Discrimination
Monk v. Columbia County Detention Facility et al
as 1:2023cv01032
Plaintiff:
Everick L. Monk
Defendant:
Columbia County Detention Facility, FNU Lowe, Sgt. Sonya Collier and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
