Cases 1 - 10 of 138
Spencer et al v. Tanner
as 2:2024cv02112
Defendant:
Larry Tanner
Plaintiff:
Bradley Spencer and Kathy Rice
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal
Clark et al v. Dolgencorp, LLC
as 5:2024cv05133
Plaintiff:
Rebecca Clark, Jennifer Frasier and Dustin Bradley Savage
Defendant:
Dolgencorp, LLC doing business as Dollar General
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Personal Injury
Maskell v. Green et al
as 1:2023cv01064
Plaintiff:
Adam Maskell
Defendant:
Deputy Andy Green, Deputy J. Ramirez, Deputy Anthony Gallegos and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
Bradley v. Potter
as 4:2023cv04015
Plaintiff:
William Leroy Bradley
Defendant:
Tommy Potter
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Bolin v. Wilkins et al
as 5:2022cv05249
Plaintiff:
Bradley R. Bolin
Defendant:
Deputy Landon Wilkins, Deputy Reeve Koehler, Corporal Benjamin Vinson, Jr. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Logan v. Cox et al
as 2:2022cv02187
Plaintiff:
Glicenia Carmela Logan
Defendant:
James O Cox, P.K. Holmes, III, David Hudson and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 241 Conspiracy Against Citizen Rights
Marcum v. Capp et al
as 2:2022cv02160
Plaintiff:
Ronald Marcum
Defendant:
Sarah Capp, Abby Yarbrough, David Saxon and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Uren v. Dennis et al
as 3:2022cv03050
Plaintiff:
Bradley Thomas Uren
Defendant:
Lt. Sebastian Dennis, Captain Jeff Lewis, Sgt. Tabitha Maze and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Uren v. Maze et al
as 3:2022cv03049
Plaintiff:
Bradley Thomas Uren
Defendant:
Sgt. T. Maze, Sgt. C. Maple, Sgt. K. James and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Francis v. Baker
as 2:2022cv02144
Plaintiff:
Luke Bradley Francis
Defendant:
Prosecuting Attorney Rinda Baker
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
