Cases 1 - 10 of 66
Boehler v. Byers et al
as 6:2024cv06043
Plaintiff:
Gary L. Boehler
Defendant:
Superintendent Jared Byers, Lieutenant Crosby, Lieutenant Edwards and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Broomfield v. Martin
as 1:2023cv01052
Plaintiff:
Franklin Broomfield
Defendant:
Leroy Martin and Sheriff Leroy Martin
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
McAdams v. Kidd et al
as 6:2023cv06030
Plaintiff:
Joe B. McAdams
Defendant:
Brandon Franklin Kidd and Kidd Holdings, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition For Removal--Other Contract
Flanary v. Elkin et al
as 2:2022cv02174
Defendant:
Jerry Dorney, Darrell Elkin, P.A., Ricky Denton and others
Plaintiff:
Douglas Flanary
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Simms v. Maricopa County Jail - Phoenix AZ et al
as 2:2022cv02117
Plaintiff:
Franklin S. Simms
Defendant:
Maricopa County Jail - Phoenix AZ and Alhambra State of Arizona Processing Prison
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
Weeks v. Stewart et al
as 6:2022cv06074
Plaintiff:
Paul Michael Weeks
Defendant:
Deputy Stewart, Rashad Nalls, Litzsey G Everett, Jr and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Franklin v. Warr
as 2:2022cv02088
Plaintiff:
Michael Locke Franklin
Defendant:
Sgt Warr
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
McAdams v. Kidd et al
as 6:2022cv06050
Plaintiff:
Joe B. McAdams
Defendant:
Brandon Franklin Kidd and Kidd Holdings, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Contract Dispute
Simmons Bank v. UFOTJENJU, LLC et al
as 5:2022cv05004
Plaintiff:
Simmons Bank
Defendant:
UFOTJENJU, LLC, TD Bank, N.A., People's United Bank and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 - Diversity: Securities Fraud
Alverson et al v. Elkhart Products Corporation
as 5:2021cv05191
Plaintiff:
Nikia Alverson, Elizabeth Asbury, Teri Bourquin and others
Defendant:
Elkhart Products Corporation
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
