Cases 1 - 10 of 68
Morris v. The Kansas City Southern Railway Company
as 4:2024cv04077
Plaintiff:
Gregory Don Morris
Defendant:
The Kansas City Southern Railway Company
Cause Of Action: 45 U.S.C. § 51 Railways: Fed. Employer's Liability Act
Patterson v. Patterson et al
as 1:2024cv01047
Defendant:
Micke Golbert, Shannon Crocket, Jesse Love and others
Plaintiff:
Kevin Patterson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
David E. Morris Sr Enterprises, LLC v. Sarasota Avionics, Inc.
as 2:2024cv02087
Defendant:
Sarasota Avionics, Inc.
Plaintiff:
David E. Morris Sr Enterprises, LLC doing business as David Morris Aviation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Breach of Contract
Williams v. Clary et al
as 1:2024cv01006
Plaintiff:
Timothy David Williams
Defendant:
Shena Clary and Vernnon Morris
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Williams v. Clary et al
as 1:2024cv01001
Plaintiff:
Timothy David Williams
Defendant:
Shena Clary, Foster Danial, Vernon Morris and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Mack v. Higgins et al
as 4:2023cv04081
Plaintiff:
Willie Aundrea Mack
Defendant:
Supervisor Whitney Higgins, Jail Nurse Stephanie Thorne, Jailer Emily Morris and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Morris v. USA
as 6:2023cv06085
Petitioner:
Randall Morris
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Levy v. USA
as 5:2023cv05032
Petitioner:
Robert Morris Levy
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2022cv05240
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Morris v. USA
as 6:2023cv06001
Petitioner:
Randall Morris
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
