Cases filed in the US District Court for the Central District of California
Cases 21 - 30 of 156
Christopher Clarke et al v. Air and Liquid Systems Corporation et al
as 2:2020cv00591
Defendant: PENTAIR VALVES & CONTROLS, INC. (sued individually and as successor-in-interest 10 KEYSTONE VALVES & CONTROLS, INC.), Gardner Denver, Inc., J.T. Thorpe & Son, Inc. and others
Plaintiff: Christopher Clarke and Clarke Cheryl
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
George Kruse et al v. Actuant Corporation et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2019cv09540
Defendant: OSRAM SYLVANIA, INC. (sued individually and as successor-in-interest to GTE SYLVANIA successor-in-interest to PHILCO-FORD), HARCOSEMCO LLC (sued individually and as successor-by-merger to HARCO LLC f/k/a HARCO LABORATORIES, INCORPORATED), LOCKHEED MARTIN CORPORATION d/b/a LOCKHEED MARTIN AERONAUTICS (sued individually and as successor-by-merger to MARTIN MARIETTA) and others
Plaintiff: George Kruse and Shigeko Kruse
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal - Asbestos Litigation
James Laukat et al v. ABB, Inc., et al. We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2019cv09436
Defendant: DCo LLC, f/k/a and individually as successor in interest to Dana Companies LLC, Victor Corporation, Victor Gaskets and Victor Manufacturing and Gasket Company, OReilly Auto Enterprises, LLC f/k/a CSK Auto, Inc. individually and as successor in interest to Grand Auto, Inc. and Kragen Auto Parts, SPX Corporation, individually and as successor in interest to Bear Automotive Service Equipment Company and others
Plaintiff: Misun Laukat and James Laukat
Petitioner: National Steel and Shipbuilding Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446 Notice of Removal - Personal Injury
Patrick W. Dennis et al v. Air and Liquid Systems Corporation et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2019cv09343
Plaintiff: PATRICK W DENNIS, ROSA DENNIS and Patrick W. Dennis
Defendant: AIR & LIQUID SYSTEMS CORPORATION (sued individually and as successor-by-merger to BUFFALO PUMPS, INC.), Foster Wheeler Energy Corporation, Foster Wheeler LLC and others
Petitioner: VIAD CORP (sued individually and as successor-in-interest to GRISCOM RUSSELL COMPANY)
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Bradford Budd et al v. 3M Company et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2019cv06420
Plaintiff: Bradford Budd and Ramona Budd
Petitioner: Foster Wheeler, LLC
Defendant: Southern California Edison Company, C.W. Driver, Inc., Torrance Refining Company LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Rima Tamrazian v. UNUM Life Insurance Company of America et al
as 2:2019cv05583
Defendant: UNUM Life Insurance Company of America, Does 1-20 and Crane Co.
Plaintiff: Rima Tamrazian
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Type: Contract Insurance
Douglas Wilber, et al v. Air and Liquid Systems Corporation, et al
as 2:2019cv04940
Plaintiff: FAITH WILBUR, DOUGLAS WILBUR, Faith Wilber and others
Defendant: Vigor Shipyards, Inc., AIR & LIQUID SYSTEMS CORPORATION (sued individually and as successor-by-merger to BUFFALO PUMPS, INC.), Elliott Company and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
United States of America v. Pac. Coast Plumb. Supply Assn et al
as 2:2019mc00084
Defendant: F. A. Nitchey, A. H. Busch Co., A. R. Gardner and others
Plaintiff: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, and United States of America
Louis Peete et al v. Foster Wheeler LLC
as 2:2019cv00111
Defendant: Foster Wheeler LLC, York International Corporation, Pacific Ship Repair and Fabrication, Inc. and others
Plaintiff: Rosie Peete and Louis Peete
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Terry Lee Siegfried et al v. 3M Company, et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2018cv01575
Cross Defendant: 3M Company, A.O. Smith Corp., ABB, Inc. and others
Defendant: 3M Company, A.O. Smith Corp., ABB, Inc. and others
Movant: Gibbs & Cox, Inc.
Cross Claimant: Schneider Electric, USA, Inc.
Plaintiff: Terri Siegfried and Terry Lee Siegfried

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?