Cases 71 - 80 of 125
Moghadem v. Department of Veterans Affairs
as 2:2015cv04999
Defendant:
Department of Veterans Affairs
Plaintiff:
Nafiseh Moghadem
ITT Educational Services, Inc. v. The California State Approving Agency For Veterans Education et al
as 8:2015cv00884
Plaintiff:
ITT Educational Services, Inc.
Defendant:
The California Department of Veterans Affairs and The California State Approving Agency For Veterans Education
Marie Rodney v. The Department of Veterans Affairs
as 2:2015cv02984
Plaintiff:
Marie Rodney
Defendant:
The Department of Veterans Affairs
Rosemarie Pesci v. Erik K Shinseki et al
as 5:2015cv00607
Defendant:
DOES 1-10, Robert McDonald, Secretary of the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, Erik K Shinseki and others
Plaintiff:
Rosemarie Pesci
Marilyn Gladle v. U. S. Department of Veterans Affairs et al
as 2:2015cv00057
Defendant:
Stephen R Bauman, Stephen R Bauman, Bette Lane Turzan and Mary Moore and others
Plaintiff:
Marilyn Gladle
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2014cv02425
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
George Robinson v. Department of Veterans Affairs et al
as 2:2014cv07398
Defendant:
Department of Veterans Affairs and Veterans Cateen Services
Plaintiff:
George Robinson
Brandon Cruz et al v. United States of America et al
as 2:2014cv06754
Plaintiff:
Brandon Cruz, Danielle Cruz and Raquel Cruz
Defendant:
Department of Veterans Affairs, Does and United States of America
Stevens v. John Doe United States Attorney et al
as 2:2014cv05023
Defendant:
Department of Veterans Affairs, John Doe Director, John Doe Human Resource Manager and others
Plaintiff:
Jimmy D. Stevens
Thunderbird Mortgage Company v. Department of Veterans Affairs of Washington D C et al
as 5:2014cv01104
Defendant:
All Persons Unknown, Department of Veterans Affairs of Washington DC, Does 1 to 100, inclusive and others
Plaintiff:
Thunderbird Mortgage Company
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
