Cases 1 - 10 of 2,048
Anthony Tyrone Davis v. Michael Santiago Render et al
as 2:2024cv04258
Plaintiff:
Anthony Tyrone Davis
Defendant:
Michael Santiago Render, Paul Duane Beauregard, Franklin Ragsdale and others
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 504 Copyright Infringement
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2024cv01025
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-(Citizenship)
Kelli Davies v. The Bank of Missouri
as 8:2024cv01051
Plaintiff:
Kelli Davies
Defendant:
The Bank of Missouri
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227 Restrictions of Use of Telephone Equipment
Silas Davis v. Panda Restaurant Group, Inc.
as 2:2024cv03984
Plaintiff:
Silas Davis
Defendant:
Panda Restaurant Group, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-(Citizenship)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv03742
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Americans With Disabilities Act
Victoria Tenisha Shanae Dillihunt v. Sean Paul et al
as 2:2024cv03602
Plaintiff:
Victoria Tenisha Shanae Dillihunt
Defendant:
Sean Paul, Troy Donald Jamerson, Ho Chi Mihn City and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Randy Quaid et al v. Craig Granet et al
as 2:2024cv03455
Plaintiff:
Randy Quaid and Evgenia Quaid
Defendant:
Craig Granet, Tony Davis, Reggie Serrano and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Robert L. Davis v. David Holbrook et al
as 2:2024cv03213
Plaintiff:
Robert L. Davis
Defendant:
David Holbrook and California Department of Corrections & Rehabilitation
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Victora Tenisha Shanae Dillihunt et al v. Clive Davis et al
as 2:2024cv03187
Plaintiff:
Victoria Tenisha Shanae Dillihunt
Defendant:
Clive Davis, Saviii 3rd, The Diamonds and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
