Cases 1 - 10 of 32
Fred Dorton v. Daisy Lee Sterkel et al
as 2:2024cv03603
Plaintiff:
Fred Dorton
Defendant:
Daisy Lee Sterkel, J. Fernandez, D. Moranville and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Guillermo Reveles v. D. Samuels
as 2:2024cv01491
Plaintiff:
Guillermo Reveles
Defendant:
D Samuels
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Raymond A. Green v. D. Samuel et al
as 2:2023cv06347
Plaintiff:
Raymond A. Green
Defendant:
D. Samuel, A. Sanchez, S. Rizo and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Joey Dayshaun Dennis v. D. Samuel et al
as 2:2023cv06294
Plaintiff:
Joey Dayshaun Dennis
Defendant:
D. Samuel, M. Roctla, Jim Robertson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Joey Dennis v. D. Samuel et al
as 2:2023cv04981
Petitioner:
Joey Dennis and Joey Dayshaun Dennis
Respondent:
Warden D. Samuel, M. Rocha, The People of Ventura County Superior Court of California and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Robert McCullock v. D. Samuel
as 2:2023cv03322
Plaintiff:
Robert McCullock
Defendant:
Warden D. Samuel, B. Phillips, D. McAlister and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Bobby Wilson v. D. Samuel et al
as 2:2023cv02330
Plaintiff:
Bobby Wilson
Defendant:
D. Samuel, Jane Doe and John Doe
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Walter Glenn Compton v. D. Samuel et al
as 2:2022cv08918
Plaintiff:
Walter Glenn Compton
Defendant:
D. Samuel and Attorney General Kamala D. Harris
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Kayveon Livingston v. D. Samuels
as 2:2022cv08173
Petitioner:
Kayveon Livingston
Respondent:
D. Samuels
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Derryl Ray Easter v. D. Samuel et al
as 2:2022cv07725
Plaintiff:
Derryl Ray Easter
Defendant:
D. Samuel and Mailroom Officer
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
