Cases 1 - 10 of 26
William McDuffey et all v. American Laundry Machinery, Inc. et al
as 2:2023cv02491
Defendant:
Warren Pumps, LLC, ITT, Inc., Paramount Global and others
Plaintiff:
William McDuffey and Teri McDuffey
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal - Asbestos Litigation
William Ollerton v. National Steel and Shipbuilding Company et al
as 2:2023cv01267
Plaintiff:
William Ollerton
Defendant:
National Steel and Shipbuilding Company, Air & Liquid Systems Corporation, a subsidiary of AMPCO-Pittsburgh Corporation, individually and as successor by merger to Buffalo Pumps, Fnc., individually and successor in interest to Buffalo Forge, Aurora Pump Company and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446 pl Notice of Removal - Product Liability
Grant Cochran et al v. Air and Liquid Systems Corporation et al
as 2:2021cv09612
Plaintiff:
Grant Cochran, Charlene Cochran, Brent Cochran and others
Defendant:
Air & Liquid Systems Corporation, sued individually and as successor-in-interest to Buffalo Pumps, Inc., CRANE CO. (sued individually and as successor-in-interest to CHAPMAN VALVE COMPANY);, General Electric Company and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Dennis A. Rockwell et al v. Air and Liquid Systems Corporation et al
as 2:2021cv03963
Defendant:
ViacomCBS Inc., Foster Wheeler LLC, Warren Pumps, LLC and others
Plaintiff:
Dawn Rockwell and Dennis A Rockwell
Alternative Dispute Resolution (Adr) Provider:
Gary Stern
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Personal Injury
James O Rourke et al v. Air and Liquid Systems Corporation et al
as 2:2020cv04884
Plaintiff:
Joan O'Rourke, James O'Rourke, James O Rourke and others
Defendant:
Fairbanks Morse Company, Cleaver Brooks, Inc., Viking Pump, Inc. and others
Debtor In Possession:
Hill Brothers Chemical Company, Inc. and IMO Industries Inc
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Christopher Clarke et al v. Air and Liquid Systems Corporation et al
as 2:2020cv00591
Defendant:
PENTAIR VALVES & CONTROLS, INC. (sued individually and as successor-in-interest 10 KEYSTONE VALVES & CONTROLS, INC.), Gardner Denver, Inc., J.T. Thorpe & Son, Inc. and others
Plaintiff:
Christopher Clarke and Clarke Cheryl
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
George Kruse et al v. Actuant Corporation et al
as 2:2019cv09540
Defendant:
OSRAM SYLVANIA, INC. (sued individually and as successor-in-interest to GTE SYLVANIA successor-in-interest to PHILCO-FORD), HARCOSEMCO LLC (sued individually and as successor-by-merger to HARCO LLC f/k/a HARCO LABORATORIES, INCORPORATED), LOCKHEED MARTIN CORPORATION d/b/a LOCKHEED MARTIN AERONAUTICS (sued individually and as successor-by-merger to MARTIN MARIETTA) and others
Plaintiff:
George Kruse and Shigeko Kruse
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal - Asbestos Litigation
James Laukat et al v. ABB, Inc., et al.
as 2:2019cv09436
Defendant:
DCo LLC, f/k/a and individually as successor in interest to Dana Companies LLC, Victor Corporation, Victor Gaskets and Victor Manufacturing and Gasket Company, OReilly Auto Enterprises, LLC f/k/a CSK Auto, Inc. individually and as successor in interest to Grand Auto, Inc. and Kragen Auto Parts, SPX Corporation, individually and as successor in interest to Bear Automotive Service Equipment Company and others
Plaintiff:
Misun Laukat and James Laukat
Petitioner:
National Steel and Shipbuilding Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446 Notice of Removal - Personal Injury
Terry Lee Siegfried et al v. 3M Company, et al
as 2:2018cv01575
Cross Defendant:
3M Company, A.O. Smith Corp., ABB, Inc. and others
Defendant:
3M Company, A.O. Smith Corp., ABB, Inc. and others
Movant:
Gibbs & Cox, Inc.
Cross Claimant:
Schneider Electric, USA, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Terri Siegfried and Terry Lee Siegfried
David Bennett et al v. Air and Liquid Systems Corporation et al
as 2:2017cv02099
Defendant:
Air and Liquid Systems Corporation, Armstrong International, Inc., CBS Corporation and others
Plaintiff:
David Paul Bennett and Naomi Bennett
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
