Cases 11 - 20 of 20
v. County of Tulare et al
as 1:2018at00405
Defendant:
County of Tulare, Tulare County Sheriff, Unknown Tulare County Sheriff Deputies named as Does 1-50 and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Huerta v. County of Tulare, California et al
as 1:2017at00802
Plaintiff:
Ramiro Huerta
Defendant:
County of Tulare, California, Tulare County Sheriff, unknown Tulare County Sheriff's Deputies named as Does 1-50 and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Banks v. Roe et al
as 1:2017cv00856
Plaintiff:
Frederick Banks
Defendant:
Adrian Roe, Mark R. Hornak, Robert Cessar and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Holcomb v. Ramar et al
as 1:2013at00481
Plaintiff:
Harvey Holcomb
Defendant:
Jerry Ramar, Officer Kroutil, Officer Cox and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Holcomb v. Ramar et al
as 1:2013cv01102
Plaintiff:
Harvey Holcomb
Defendant:
Jerry Ramar, Officer Kroutil, Officer Cox and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Perez v. Roe et al
as 2:2010cv01423
Defendant:
W Roe, City of Isleton and Ron Jole
Plaintiff:
Juan Martinez Perez
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
v. Roe et al
as 2:2010at00754
Defendant:
W Roe, City of Isleton and Ron Jole
Plaintiff:
Juan Martinez Perez
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Benge v. Sprueill et al
as 1:2010at00395
Plaintiff:
Justin Benge
Defendant:
Officer Sprueill, C. Cromwell, City of Modesto and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Benge v. Sprueill et al
as 1:2010cv00978
Plaintiff:
Justin Benge
Defendant:
Officer Sprueill, C. Cromwell, City of Modesto and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Lehr et al v. City of Sacramento et al
as 2:2007at00707
Plaintiff:
Anthony Lehr, Connie Hopson, Floyd Hopwood and others
Defendant:
City of Sacramento, Albert Najera, Police Chief, Mike Cooper, Police Officer and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
