Cases 11 - 20 of 21
Metropolitan Life Insurance Company v. Foote et al
as 2:2018at01589
Defendant:
Michael M. Foote and Neta I. Rausa
Plaintiff:
Metropolitan Life Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1335
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2018cv01707
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2018at01062
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Aguirre v. Gipson et al
as 1:2013cv00604
Plaintiff:
Louis Juarez Aguirre
Defendant:
Connie Gipson, C. Rodriguez, Craig Hennes and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
United States of America v. Approximately $86,386.34 in U.S. Currency seized from Wells Fargo Bank Account Number 837-8529088 et al
as 2:2012mc00084
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Defendant:
Approximately $86,386.34 in U.S. Currency seized from Wells Fargo Bank Account Number 837-8529088, Approximately $75,799.17 in U.S. Currency seized from Wells Fargo Bank Account Number 237-4897144, Approximately $12,487.89 in U.S. Currency seized from Wells Fargo Bank Account Number 837-7300564 and others
Cause Of Action: Civil Miscellaneous Case
Robert Raymond v. Kammi Foote
as 1:2012cv01407
Plaintiff:
Robert Raymond
Defendant:
Kammi Foote
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Raymond v. Foote
as 1:2012at00563
Plaintiff:
Robert Raymond
Defendant:
Kammi Foote
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Riseley v. Warden, High Desert State Prison, et al.,
as 2:2012cv01695
Plaintiff:
Thomas Foote Riseley
Defendant:
Warden, High Desert State Prison and Brown
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Foote v. Cate
as 2:2011cv01287
Petitioner:
Michael Foote
Respondent:
Matthew Cate
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Foote v. Cate, et al
as 2:2010cv00217
Petitioner:
Michael D. Foote
Respondent:
Matthew Cate, Kathleen Dickinson and California Community Release Board
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
