Cases 51 - 60 of 76
Serrano v. Rawers et al
as 1:2011cv00399
Plaintiff:
Jessie L. Serrano
Defendant:
Scott Rawers, Edward S. Alameida, Jr., E. Roe and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Roe v. Yates
as 1:2011cv00347
Petitioner:
Jeffrey Dennis Roe
Respondent:
James A. Yates
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Ruvalcaba et al v. Consolidated Concepts, Inc. et al
as 2:2011at00188
Plaintiff:
Jose Ruvalcaba, Ruben Ruvalcaba, Francisco Ruvalcaba Sr. and others
Defendant:
Consolidated Concepts, Inc., Balfour Beatty Construction Company, Inc., Does 1-10 and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1352
Chim v. Wachovia et al
as 1:2011cv00073
Plaintiff:
Sameth Chim
Defendant:
Wachovia, DOES 1 through 10 inclusive and Roe Corporations 1 through 5 inclusive
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2410
Prudential Annuities Life Assurance Corporation v. Fairfield et al
as 2:2010at01116
Plaintiff:
Prudential Annuities Life Assurance Corporation
Defendant:
Nancy L Fairfield, Devin Roe, Cassandra Roe and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Prudential Annuities Life Assurance Corporation v. Fairfield et al
as 2:2010cv02046
Plaintiff:
Prudential Annuities Life Assurance Corporation
Defendant:
Nancy L Fairfield, Devin Roe, Cassandra Roe and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
v. Fairfield et al
as 2:2010at01115
Interpleader:
Prudential Annuities Life Assurance Corporation
Defendant:
Nancy L Fairfield, Devin Roe, Cassandra Roe and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Perez v. Roe et al
as 2:2010cv01423
Defendant:
W Roe, City of Isleton and Ron Jole
Plaintiff:
Juan Martinez Perez
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
v. Roe et al
as 2:2010at00754
Defendant:
W Roe, City of Isleton and Ron Jole
Plaintiff:
Juan Martinez Perez
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Benge v. Sprueill et al
as 1:2010at00395
Plaintiff:
Justin Benge
Defendant:
Officer Sprueill, C. Cromwell, City of Modesto and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
