Cases 1 - 10 of 3,383
(PC) DePonte v. Stohl et al
as 1:2024cv00695
Plaintiff:
David Arthur DePonte
Defendant:
Stohl, Stern, J Saucedo and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
(PC) Blackman v. Hill et al
as 2:2024cv01149
Plaintiff:
Tony Blackman
Defendant:
J. Hill, Jennifer Damies, S. D. Rutledge and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
(PC) Mackey v. Rudd, et al.
as 1:2024cv00648
Plaintiff:
Terry Mackey
Defendant:
Rudd, K. Ram, Sgt. Mix and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv01540
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201 Constitutionality of State Statute(s)
(PS) Belcher v. Bonta, et al.,
as 2:2024cv00976
Plaintiff:
Anthony D. Belcher, Sr.
Defendant:
Rob Bonta, Laurie M. Earl, Sebastian Brady and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
(HC) Khouanmany v. Painter
as 2:2024cv01189
Petitioner:
Vilaychith Khonamany and Vilaychith Khouanmany
Respondent:
Daniel K. Painter
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
(PC) Diaz v. Botmi et al
as 2:2024cv01417
Plaintiff:
Jesus Diaz
Defendant:
K. Botmi and C. Villanueva
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00601
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
(PC) Abdullah v. Santoro, et al.
as 1:2024cv00572
Plaintiff:
Jalaal Abdullah
Defendant:
Kelly Santoro, K. Mixon, M. Ayala and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
(PC) Tellez v. Hixon et al
as 1:2024cv00402
Plaintiff:
Rudy Tellez
Defendant:
K. Hixon, E. Cisneros and M. Tafoya
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
