Cases 1 - 9 of 9
Pacific Coast Federation of Fishermen's Associations, et al. v. Ross, et al.
as 1:2020cv00431
Intervenor:
Provident Irrigation District, State Water Contractors, Maxwell Irrigation District and others
Defendant:
U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, Wilbur Ross, Bureau of Reclamation and others
Plaintiff:
Golden State Salmon Association, Bay.Org, Pacific Coast Federation of Fishermen's Associations and others
Petitioner:
People of the State of California, California Natural Resources Agency and California Environmental Protection Agency
Intervenor Defendant:
Oakdale Irrigation District, Knights Landing Investors, LLC, South San Joaquin Irrigation District and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702
National Association of Wheat Growers et al v. Zeise et al
as 2:2017cv02401
Plaintiff:
Associated Industries of Missouri, Agribusiness Association of Iowa, National Corn Growers Association and others
Defendant:
Xavier Becerra and Lauren Zeise
Amicus Curiae:
State of Iowa, State of Indiana, The National Health Federation and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201
Bay.org et al v. Zinke et al
as 1:2017cv01176
Defendant:
Ryan Zinke , Greg Sheehan and U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service
Plaintiff:
Bay.org , Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc. and Defenders of Wildlife
Intervenor_defendant:
State Water Contractors , Metropolitan Water District of Southern California and Department of Water Resources
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551
Golden Gate Salmon Association, et al. v. Ross, et al.
as 1:2017cv01172
Defendant:
Wilbur Ross , Chris Oliver and National Marine Fisheries Service
Plaintiff:
Golden Gate Salmon Association , Bay.org , Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc. and others
Intervenor_defendant:
State Water Contractors , Metropolitan Water District of Southern California and Department of Water Resources
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702
California Dump Truck Owners Association v. Air Resources Board
as 2:2011cv00384
Plaintiff:
California Dump Truck Owners Association
Intervenor_defendant:
Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc.
Defendant:
Mary D Nichols and James Goldstene
Cause Of Action: 49 U.S.C. § 1471
Rocky Mountain Farmers Union et al v. Corey, et al
as 1:2009cv02234
Plaintiff:
Rocky Mountain Farmers Union, Redwood County Minnesota Corn and Soybeans Growers, Penny Newman Grain, Inc. and others
Defendant:
James N. Goldstene, Mary D. Nichols, Daniel Sperling and others
Intervenor Defendant:
Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc., Sierra Club, Conservation Law Foundation and others
Amicus Curiae:
State of Oregon, Brazillian Sugar Cane Industry Association (UNICA), Oregon Petroleum Association and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Arc Ecology, et al v United States Maritime Administration, et al
as 2:2007cv02320
Plaintiff:
Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc., Arc Ecology and San Francisco Baykeeper
Defendant:
United States Maritime Administration, Sean T. Connaughton, United States Department of Transportation and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 4321 Review of Agency Action-Environment
Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc. et al
as 2:2007at01029
Plaintiff:
Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc., Arc Ecology and San Francisco Baykeeper
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 4321 Review of Agency Action-Environment
Natural Resources De, et al v. Houston, et al
as 2:1988cv01658
Plaintiff:
Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc. , Trout Unlimited Of C , Bay Institute Of San and others
Defendant:
David G. Houston , Donald P. Hodel , Friant Water Users A and others
Intervenor_defendant:
Madera Irrigation , Chowcilla Water District , Orange Cove Irrigation District and others
Amicu:
State Water Resources Control Board of the State of California , Central Delta Water Agency , South Delta Water Agency and others
Intervenor:
Friant Water Users Authority , San Luis & Delta-Mendota Water Authority and Tehama-Colusa Canal Authority
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 4332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
