Cases 31 - 40 of 567
Case v. Broomfield et al
as 5:2023cv05757
Plaintiff:
Charles E. Case
Defendant:
Ron Broomfield and Warden
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Coleman v. Public Defender Office
as 3:2023cv05532
Plaintiff:
Wendell Coleman
Defendant:
Public Defenders Office/ Principle Ron Abernathy, B.O.S./ County of Napa and Sang Nguyen
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 241 Conspiracy Against Citizen Rights
Khan v. Broomfield
as 3:2023cv05249
Petitioner:
Mohammed Zarin Khan
Respondent:
Ron Broomfield
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Lancaster v. Ayers et al
as 4:2023cv05169
Plaintiff:
Andrew Derric Lancaster
Defendant:
Robert Ayers, Ron Davis, Ron Broomfield and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Poye-Perez v. Diaz et al
as 3:2023cv04933
Plaintiff:
Serguey Poye-Perez
Defendant:
R Diaz, K Allison, R Davis and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Odell v. Bloomfield et al
as 3:2023cv04795
Plaintiff:
Richard K. Odell
Defendant:
Warden Ron Bloomfield, Ron Davis, Ralph Diaz and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Associated Industries Insurance Company, Inc. v. Ron Perez Construction LLC et al
as 3:2023cv03894
Plaintiff:
Associated Industries Insurance Company, Inc.
Defendant:
Ron Perez Construction LLC, Jeepreel Ronaldo Perez, Ann Javer and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Declaratory Judgement
Lopez v. Lee et al
as 4:2023cv03660
Plaintiff:
Andrew Lopez
Defendant:
M. Lee, Hamner, Cross and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hickson v. Broomfield
as 1:2023cv03233
Petitioner:
Christopher A. Hickson
Respondent:
Ron Broomfield
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Irving v. Broomfield
as 3:2023cv02949
Petitioner:
Daniel D Irving
Defendant:
Warden Ron Broomfield
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
