Cases 71 - 80 of 1,164
Jones Lang Lasalle Americas, Inc. v. Archer Aviation, Inc.
as 3:2023cv00791
Plaintiff:
Jones Lang Lasalle Americas, Inc.
Defendant:
Archer Aviation, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Other Contract
Jones v. Noah's New York Bagels Company
as 5:2023cv00596
Plaintiff:
Janete Jones
Defendant:
Noah's New York Bagels Company
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 704 Labor Litigation
Jones v. Sequoia Benefits & Insurance Services LLC et al
as 3:2023cv00539
Plaintiff:
Seth Jones
Defendant:
Sequoia Benefits & Insurance Services LLC and Sequoia One Poe, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Oxley v. Contra Costa County Sheriff Department et al
as 4:2023cv00510
Plaintiff:
Samuel Russ Oxley
Defendant:
Contra Costa County Sheriff Department, Samuel Jones, Daniel Husted and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Bradford v. Withrow et al
as 4:2023cv00513
Plaintiff:
Raymond Alford Bradford
Defendant:
Patrick Withrow, Samuel Cortez, Pattersson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Shah v. Robinhood Financial LLC
as 3:2023cv00405
Plaintiff:
Maulik Shah, Cesar Gonzalez, Daniel De La Cruz and others
Defendant:
Robinhood Financial LLC, Robinhood Securities, LLC and Robinhood Markets, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1330 Breach of Contract
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2023cv00298
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Jones v. City of Oakland
as 3:2023cv00166
Plaintiff:
Theo Cedar Jones
Defendant:
City of Oakland
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Sharp et al v. Gilead Sciences, Inc.
as 4:2022cv09184
Plaintiff:
Dan T. Sharp, Dana W. Hart, Darryl J. Brown and others
Defendant:
Gilead Sciences, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-(Citizenship)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
