Cases 1 - 10 of 21
S. v. Uber Technologies, Inc. et al
as 3:2024cv05018
Plaintiff:
K. S.
Defendant:
Rasier, LLC, Rasier-CA, LLC and Uber Technologies, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
S. v. Uber Technologies, Inc. et al
as 3:2024cv01916
Plaintiff:
K. S.
Defendant:
Uber Technologies, Inc., Rasier, LLC and Rasier-CA, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
S. v. Uber Technologies, Inc. et al
as 3:2024cv01157
Plaintiff:
K. S.
Defendant:
Uber Technologies, Inc., Rasier, LLC and Rasier-CA, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
C., et al v. Wisp, Inc..
as 4:2023cv06155
Plaintiff:
B. C., M. D., A. F. and others
Defendant:
Wisp, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
L. et al v. Alphabet Inc. et al
as 3:2023cv03440
Plaintiff:
J. L., C. B., P. M. and others
Defendant:
Alphabet Inc., Google DeepMind and Google LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Smith et al v. Meta Platforms Inc et al
as 4:2022cv06421
Plaintiff:
Chad Smith and K. S.
Defendant:
Meta Platforms Inc., Facebook Holdings, LLC, Facebook Operations, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Smith et al v. Hayward et al
as 4:2021cv08467
Plaintiff:
Caleb Smith, Tamoshia Mason, K. S. and others
Defendant:
City of Hayward, Michael Miller, Christopher Suozzo and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
S. v. Anthem Blue Cross of California
as 3:2021cv05498
Plaintiff:
K. S.
Defendant:
Anthem Blue Cross of California
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132
Christian v. California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation et al
as 5:2020cv06483
Defendant:
E Nze, R Ablog, R C Younger and others
Plaintiff:
Earl Dean Christian
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2020cv05651
Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 0158
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
