Cases 1 - 10 of 49
Hillard et al v. City of Antioch et al
as 3:2023cv06573
Plaintiff:
Shaquille Hillard, Danyel Lacy, Kaycee Suitter and others
Defendant:
City of Antioch, Tammany Brooks, Tony Morefield and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Querol v. Richards et al
as 1:2022cv01800
Plaintiff:
Rommel Querol
Defendant:
C/O Richards, A. Smith, D. Bell and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Arc Wood & Timbers, LLC v. Riverwood Flooring & Paneling, Inc. et al
as 4:2021cv04885
Defendant:
Keith Lacy and Riverwood Flooring & Paneling, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Arc Wood & Timbers, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Hernandez v. I.S.U. et al
as 4:2021cv04368
Defendant:
AW, CPT Parry, CCII Sheldon and others
Plaintiff:
Joseph Hernandez
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Allen v. 3M Company et al
as 5:2021cv03428
Plaintiff:
Ken Allen, Jim Carter, Tom Afflixio and others
Defendant:
Archroma U.S. Inc., Chemours Company, The, Tyco Fire Products, LP and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Lacy v. Miyamoto
as 4:2021cv03377
Petitioner:
Roy Donovan Lacy
Respondent:
Paul Miyamoto
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Lacy v. Myamoto et al
as 4:2020cv03036
Petitioner:
Roy D. Lacy
Respondent:
Xavier Becerra and Paul Myamoto
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Stormes v. Monsanto Company
as 3:2019cv06026
Plaintiff:
Lacy Stormes
Defendant:
Monsanto Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Lacy et al v. San Joaquin Regional Rail Commission et al
as 3:2019cv03984
Defendant:
Union Pacific Railroad Company, National Passenger Railroad Corporation, San Joaquin Regional Rail Commission and others
Plaintiff:
Kara Quirke and Deanna Lacy
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Lacy et al v. City of San Francisco et al
as 3:2019cv02662
Defendant:
San Francisco, San Francisco Police Officer Hutchinson # 904, Doe 1-25 and others
Plaintiff:
Denise Lacy, D.G. a minor and D.G.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
