Cases 11 - 20 of 86
Hamman et al v. Cava Group, Inc.
as 3:2022cv00593
Plaintiff:
Neil Hamman and Michael Stewart
Defendant:
Cava Group, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 fr Diversity-Fraud
De Cristo Cano et al v. Biden et al
as 3:2022cv00193
Plaintiff:
Corazon De Cristo Cano, Terry Hardin, Crystal Irvin and others
Defendant:
Joseph R. Biden, Safer Federal Workforce Task Force, United States Office of Personnel Management and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 bb Religious Freedom Restoration Act of 1993
Sanchez v. McDowell
as 3:2022cv00192
Petitioner:
Orlando Sanchez
Respondent:
Neil McDowell
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Finger v. Arena Pharmaceuticals, Inc. et al
as 3:2022cv00039
Plaintiff:
Katherine Finger
Defendant:
Arena Pharmaceuticals, Inc., Gary A. Neil, Jayson Dallas and others
Breitbard v. California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation et al
as 3:2022cv00027
Plaintiff:
Neil Breitbard
Defendant:
California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation and Guillermo Viera Rosa
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 bv Bivens Non-Prisoner
Lepore v. Aras Corporation et al
as 3:2021cv00922
Defendant:
Jeff Louie, Ravi Sankaran, Terry Quan and others
Plaintiff:
Meredith Lepore
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 lr
Carr v. McDowell et al
as 3:2021cv00900
Respondent:
Neil McDowell and Rob Bonta
Petitioner:
Paul D. Carr
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
James E. Turner v. Neil McDowell
as 3:2021cv00432
Respondent:
Neil McDowell
Petitioner:
James E. Turner
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Ramsey v. McDowell
as 3:2021cv00365
Petitioner:
Jaquan Donte Ramsey
Respondent:
Neil McDowell
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Uhuru v. Diaz et al
as 3:2020cv02056
Plaintiff:
Kohen Diallo Uhuru and Priest
Defendant:
Ralph Diaz, J. Clark Kelso, Neil Schneider and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
