Cases 1 - 10 of 12
Lily et al v. Rosenow
as 3:2023cv00644
Defendant:
Carsten Igor Rosenow and Carlos Senta
Plaintiff:
Lily, Sarah, Jane Roe and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 pi Fed. Question: Personal Injury
Roe et al v. CVS Health Corporation et al
as 3:2022cv01776
Plaintiff:
Jane Roe and Jane Doe
Defendant:
CVS Health Corporation and CVS Pharmacy Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 pi Diversity-Personal Injury
Rosario v. Mountain Top Market et al
as 3:2022cv00519
Plaintiff:
DANIEL ROSARIO
Defendant:
Mountain Top Market, MOUNTAIN TOP MARKET & GAS, PROGRESSIVE GARDEN STATE INSURANCE COMPANY and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 pi Diversity-Personal Injury
Lily et al v. Cooper
as 3:2019cv00745
Plaintiff:
Jane Doe, Jane Roe, Lily and others
Defendant:
Tay Christopher Cooper
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2019cv00196
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Intervenor Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 0201 fl
Dornan et al v. Johnson et al
as 3:2016cv00750
Plaintiff:
Jane Doe and Jane Roe
Defendant:
Jeh Johnson , Armando Gonzalez, Does 1 to 50 and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Roe v. Kentech Consulting, Inc. et al
as 3:2015cv01380
Plaintiff:
Jane Roe
Defendant:
Kentech Consulting, Inc., Suna Solutions, Alere, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681
Hirano v. Williams et al
as 3:2013cv02421
Plaintiff:
Douglas A. Hirano
Defendant:
Williams, Walker, Bouche and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Roe v. San Diego, City of et al
as 3:2012cv00243
Plaintiff:
Jane Roe
Defendant:
San Diego, City of, William Lansdowne, Anthony Arevalos and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2007cv01487
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 0157 Motion for Withdrawal of Reference
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
