Cases 11 - 20 of 4,342
JOHNSON v. YOUNG
as 5:2024cv00050
Plaintiff:
JAMES RUSSELL JOHNSON
Defendant:
YOUNG
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
JOHNSON v. PACE
as 5:2024cv00051
Plaintiff:
JAMES RUSSELL JOHNSON
Defendant:
ANDY PACE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
BUSBY v. JOHNSON
as 3:2024cv00069
Plaintiff:
JEREMY BUSBY
Defendant:
BOB JOHNSON, JOHN DOE 1 and JOHN DOE 2
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
JOHNSON v. GARRETT
as 3:2024cv00056
Petitioner:
WALTER JOHNSON, III
Respondent:
C GARRETT
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
JOHNSON v. MERIDIAN BEHAVIORAL HEALTHCARE INC
as 1:2024cv00017
Plaintiff:
ANIYA JOHNSON
Defendant:
MERIDIAN BEHAVIORAL HEALTHCARE, INC. and MERIDIAN BEHAVIORAL HEALTHCARE INC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Contract Dispute
HADDEN et al v. THE PROCTER AND GAMBLE COMPANY et al
as 3:2024cv00035
Plaintiff:
Haley Hadden and Bonnie Van Noy
Defendant:
The Procter and Gamble Company, RECKITT BENCKISER, LLC, Johnson and Johnson Consumer Companies, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
JOHNSON v. DIXON
as 5:2024cv00003
Petitioner:
ELBERT JOHNSON
Respondent:
STATE OF FLORIDA and RICKY D DIXON
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
PEAVY v. BARBER et al
as 5:2023cv00332
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL PEAVY and MIKHAI AL-QUADI
Defendant:
BARBER, HUBBARD, K JOHNSON and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
FERNANDEZ v. JOHNSON et al
as 4:2023cv00538
Plaintiff:
JONATHAN J FERNANDEZ
Defendant:
DR JOHNSON, RICKY DIXON, ARMOR CONTRACTED BY DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
TIERNEY v. SCRUGGS et al
as 3:2023cv24768
Plaintiff:
CHRISTOPHER M TIERNEY
Defendant:
SCRUGGS, B WENTZ, JOHN DOE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
