Cases 51 - 60 of 1,795
Werling v. Ball
as 1:2023cv23600
Plaintiff:
Nicholas Scott Werling and Lil Sippy
Defendant:
Denita R. Ball
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Branchesi v. Dixon et al
as 1:2023cv23580
Plaintiff:
Louis Branchesi
Defendant:
Ricky D. Dixon and Scott Cumbie
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 State Prisoner Civil Rights
Scott v. Dixon
as 2:2023cv14282
Plaintiff:
Ray Eugene Scott
Defendant:
Ricky D Dixon
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Scott v. South Florida Regional Transportation Authority
as 0:2023cv61762
Plaintiff:
Lawrence Scott
Defendant:
South Florida Regional Transportation Authority
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights (Employment Discrimination)
Cohen v. Department of Veterans Affairs
as 9:2023cv81210
Plaintiff:
Glenn Scott Cohen
Defendant:
Department of Veterans Affairs
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Personal Injury
Viegas et al v. Jones et al
as 4:2023cv10066
Plaintiff:
James Viegas and Keri Lynn Viegas
Defendant:
Mark H. Jones, Devonna Alce, Kevin Madok and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 0241 Conspiracy Against Citizen Rights
Davis et al v. Miami-Dade County
as 9:2023cv81114
Plaintiff:
Louise Davis and William Scott Davis
Defendant:
Miami-Dade County
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
Davis et al v. Miami-Dade County
as 1:2023cv22913
Plaintiff:
Louise Davis and William Scott Davis
Defendant:
Miami-Dade County
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
Powell v. Racetrac, Inc.
as 1:2023cv22802
Plaintiff:
Scott Powell
Defendant:
Racetrac, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Notice of Removal
Scott v. GlaxoSmithKline et al
as 3:2023cv23090
Plaintiff:
Rose Scott
Defendant:
GlaxoSmithKline, Patheon Inc., Pfizer Inc and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
