Cases filed in the US District Court for the Middle District of Georgia
Cases 11 - 17 of 17
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2012cv00154
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
SMITH v. GEORGIA et al
as 5:2012cv00347
Plaintiff: STEVEN EUGENE SMITH
Defendant: STATE OF GEORGIA, HOWARD Z SIMMS and MARTHA C CHRISTIAN
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2012cv00088
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 621
SPILLERS v. CRAWFORD COUNTY GEORGIA et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 5:2011cv00324
Plaintiff: HAROLD SPILLERS
Defendant: CRAWFORD COUNTY GEORGIA , HOWARD Z SIMMS , KERRY DUNAWAY and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2010cv00017
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights (Employment Discrimination)
Wood et al v. Archbold Medical Center, Inc. et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 7:2007cv00109
Plaintiff: Mark G. Wood
Defendant: Archbold Medical Center Inc , John D. Archbold Memorial Hospital, Inc. , Ken B. Beverly and others
Movant: William A Thompson , TPA Captive Insurance Company Inc , Quincy Dialysis, Tallahassee Dialysis, West Tallahassee Dialysis, Tallahassee South, Madison Four-Freedom and others
Objector: Quincy Dialysis, Draffin & Tucker, C.P.A. and Sewell, Morgan & Hilliard, P.C.
Counter_claimant: Mel Hartsfield , Archbold Medical Center Inc , John D. Archbold Memorial Hospital, Inc. and others
Counter_defendant: Mark G. Wood
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Anti-trust
Thomas v. Simms et al
as 5:2008cv00041
Plaintiff: Sok Kyom Thomas
Defendant: Howard Z. Simms, John Carlton Cook and Martha C. Christian
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?