Cases 21 - 30 of 84
JONES v. FORD et al
as 5:2020cv00422
Defendant:
MEDICAL DIRECTOR JOSEPH P FOWLKES, JOHN AND OR JANE DOES, DOCTOR FOGUM and others
Plaintiff:
BRYAN L VIZION JONES
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2020cv00228
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Not Classified By Court:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
LITTLE v. USA
as 3:2020cv00102
Respondent:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Petitioner:
BRYAN SHAMAR LITTLE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
PARKER v. SISK et al
as 5:2020cv00199
Defendant:
RONALD ROACH, LIEUTENANT L C CRIPPS, CAPTAIN BRYAN HUCKABEE and others
Plaintiff:
CHARLES ANTHONY PARKER, JR
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
CRESPO v. GEORGIA
as 3:2020cv00038
Defendant:
HENRY HUFF, JERI COLLYN BLAKEMAN, LANCE SAVAGE and others
Plaintiff:
DAVID BRYAN CRESPO
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
JOHNSON, ET AL V. BELL, ET AL
as 7:2020cv00004
Defendant:
BRIAN BELL, RODNEY BRYAN, BRANDON BELL and others
Plaintiff:
KENDRICK LAMAR JOHNSON, KENNETH JOHNSON and JACQUELYN JOHNSON
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
PATEL et al v. AKBRUDIN
as 7:2019cv00188
Defendant:
DAVIS HARRIS, CHARLES M WALKER, VISHNU SUTARIA and others
Not Classified By Court:
NARENDRA MODI and EVA M LAMEH
Plaintiff:
KRISHNA PATEL and VIJAY PATEL
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961
POSTELL v. CITY OF CORDELE GEORGIA et al
as 1:2019cv00148
Defendant:
LOUIS NEW, VICE CHAIR JEANIE BARTEE, JUDGE G RUSSELL WRIGHT and others
Plaintiff:
CRANDALL POSTELL
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 7:2019cv00136
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Not Yet Classified:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2019cv00138
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
