Cases 31 - 40 of 46
NICHOLS v. ATTORNEY GENERAL STATE OF GEORGIA et al
as 4:2018cv00187
Defendant:
CHRISTOPHER CARR and ATTORNEY GENERAL STATE OF GEORGIA
Plaintiff:
SHANE NICHOLS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
ALFORD v. CARR
as 4:2018cv00166
Petitioner:
ANTONIO G ALFORD and ANTONIO G ALFORD, JR
Respondent:
STATE OF GEORGIA and CHRISTOPHER CARR
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
FOWLER v. GOSS et al
as 1:2018cv00143
Defendant:
CLERK EVONNE MULL, ATTORNEY CHARLES ARNOLD, JR, ATTORNEY GENERAL CHRISTOPHER CARR and others
Plaintiff:
TOREY FOWLER
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
HOGAN v. DEAL et al
as 1:2018cv00131
Plaintiff:
RICKY LAMAR HOGAN
Defendant:
GOVERNOR NATHAN DEAL, STATE ATTORNEY GENER CHRISTOPHER CARR and COMMISSIONER GREGORY DOZIER
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Jones v. Carr et al
as 7:2018cv00077
Petitioner:
CRAIG L JONES
Respondent:
CHRISTOPHER CARR and STATE OF GEORGIA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
TERRELL v. DOZIER et al
as 5:2017cv00478
Petitioner:
WILLIE JAMES TERRELL, JR
Respondent:
GREGORY DOZIER, DOC, W.A.S.P. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
TERRELL v. DAVIS
as 5:2017cv00441
Plaintiff:
WILLIE JAMES TERRELL, JR
Defendant:
PATRICIA DENIESE DAVIS, AVONNA SMITH, SEDRICK JEROME HODGE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 7:2014cv00122
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
CARR et al v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
as 5:2012cv00520
Plaintiff:
GERALD M CARR and STACY C CARR
Defendant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 26 U.S.C. § 7422 IRS: Refund Taxes
MILLER et al v. BIBB COUNTY SCHOOL DISTRICT et al
as 5:2012cv00239
Plaintiff:
LESTER M MILLER , GARY BECHTEL and BRENDA SUTTON
Defendant:
BIBB COUNTY SCHOOL DISTRICT , MACON BIBB COUNTY BOARD OF ELECTIONS AND VOTER REGISTRATION and ELAINE CARR
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
