Cases 61 - 70 of 325
EDWARDS v. EMMONS et al
as 7:2021cv00042
Respondent:
SCOTT CRICKMAR, RAYMOND MOODY, AL JONES and others
Petitioner:
RANDY EDWARDS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
AUSTIN v. TEGNA, INC. D/B/A WMAZ-TV et al
as 5:2021cv00108
Defendant:
TEGNA NATIONAL SALES & FINANCE LLC and TEGNA INC doing business as WMAZ TV
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL SCOTT AUSTIN
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 504
EDWARDS v. EMMONS et al
as 7:2021cv00032
Respondent:
SCOTT CRICKMAR, Deputy Warden SHROPSHIRE, Deputy Warden MIMS and others
Petitioner:
RANDY EDWARDS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
MORGAN v. WARD et al
as 7:2021cv00033
Defendant:
SHAWN EMMONS, SCOTT CRICKMAR, ROBERT TOOLE and others
Plaintiff:
SHEM O MORGAN
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
FORD v. JANUARY et al
as 5:2021cv00007
Defendant:
DETECTIVE EVERETT D JANUARY, DETECTIVE PHILLIP CARL VINSON and OFFICER SCOTT ROGERS
Plaintiff:
JOSEPH FORD
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
SCOTT v. LONG et al
as 5:2020cv00459
Defendant:
MAJOR JEFF NIX, OFFICER MATHEW MUNGER, OFFICER BRICE and others
Plaintiff:
XAVIER MILLER SCOTT
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 7:2020cv00224
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Not Classified By Court:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
CHAMBERLAIN et al v. CARING RIDE INC et al
as 3:2020cv00101
Defendant:
JASON WALKER, CARING RIDE INC, ROBERT HUNTER and others
Plaintiff:
CARING MAN IN A VAN LLC and MICHAEL SCOTT CHAMBERLAIN
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Chamberlain et al v. Caring Ride, Inc. et al
as 3:2020cv00100
Defendant:
Jason Walker, Robert Hunter and Caring Ride, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Michael Scott Chamberlain and Caring Man In a Van, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2020cv00214
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
