Cases 1 - 10 of 18
CRUTCHLEY v. LOWNDES COUNTY JAIL et al
as 7:2023cv00017
Petitioner:
ADAM WADE CRUTCHLEY
Respondent:
LOWNDES COUNTY JAIL and SOUTHERN HEALTH PARTNERS INC
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
TOOMEY v. LONG et al
as 5:2021cv00416
Plaintiff:
JASON M TOOMEY
Defendant:
GARY LONG, SOUTHERN HEALTH PARTNERS, MICHAEL MCMUNN and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
NEGRIN v. MITCHUM et al
as 5:2020cv00399
Defendant:
SOUTHERN HEALTH PARTNERS, JUDGE DAVID BROWN, SHERIFF DARREN MITCHUM and others
Plaintiff:
ERIC M NEGRIN
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
HOPE v. BELL et al
as 7:2015cv00065
Plaintiff:
NICKOLAS VAN NESS HOPE
Defendant:
BELL, SOUTHERN HEALTH PARTNERS and SHIRLEY LEWIS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
KING v. SOUTHERN HEALTH PARTNERS INC et al
as 5:2014cv00355
Plaintiff:
ISSAC KING, JR
Defendant:
SOUTHERN HEALTH PARTNERS INC and COMMAND NURSE VICKI
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
TERRY v. Shirley Lewis, et al.
as 7:2013cv00143
Plaintiff:
VERNON JOE TERRY
Defendant:
Shirley Lewis, Chris Prine and SOUTHERN HEALTH PARTNERS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
STERLING v. EDWARDS et al
as 3:2013cv00072
Plaintiff:
KENNETH MELVIN STERLING, III
Defendant:
IRA EDWARDS, CLARKE COUNTY SHERIFF'S OFFICE, CLARKE COUNTY GOVERNMENT and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
GRADDY v. Southern Health Partners Inc et al
as 7:2011cv00145
Plaintiff:
CHARLES B GRADDY
Defendant:
Southern Health Partners Inc and Shirley Lewis
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Harris v. Southern Health Partners Inc et al
as 5:2011cv00022
Plaintiff:
Subrina Harris
Defendant:
Southern Health Partners Inc, S. C. Anderson, Valerie Brown and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hogan v. Holt et al
as 5:2011cv00020
Plaintiff:
Alvin Wayne Hogan
Defendant:
Charles Holt, Cullen Talton, Houston County Commission and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
