Cases 1 - 10 of 21
HUMANITARIAN v. TREADWELL et al
as 7:2024cv00038
Plaintiff:
HUMANITARIAN
Defendant:
MARC T TREADWELL, JUDGE LESLIE A GARDNER, KATHLEEN LOGSDON and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
HUMANITARIAN v. LEARY et al
as 7:2024cv00032
Plaintiff:
HUMANITARIAN, Larry L. Thomas Jr and LARRY L THOMAS JR
Defendant:
PETER D LEARY, STEPHEN LYNN, PETER KO and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
VINSON v. GARLAND
as 5:2024cv00063
Petitioner:
JASON MORGAN VINSON
Respondent:
MERRICK GARLAND, JOY ODOM, MARC T TREADWELL and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
TREADWELL v. WHITEHEAD et al
as 7:2022cv00101
Plaintiff:
DEANTHONY TREADWELL and DAVID JAMELSON
Defendant:
LAKEISHA WHITEHEAD, Officer MCRAE, JOHN/JANE DOES and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
MATHIS v. WEIGLE et al
as 5:2021cv00165
Petitioner:
RUSSELL TODD MATHIS
Respondent:
MAGISTRATE JUDGE CHARLES H WEIGLE and DISTRICT JUDGE MARC T TREADWELL
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
TREADWELL v. DOZIER et al
as 5:2019cv00235
Plaintiff:
DEANTHONY TREADWELL and DAVID JAMALSON
Defendant:
LT DAVIS, LIEUTENANT RONNIE SHOEMAKER, MCCRAY and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
TREADWELL v. ALLEN et al
as 5:2018cv00191
Plaintiff:
DEANTHONY TREADWELL
Defendant:
MARTY ALLEN, RONNIE SHOEMAKER and CERT
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
TREADWELL v. SELLERS et al
as 5:2018cv00154
Plaintiff:
DEANTHONY TREADWELL
Defendant:
ERIC SELLERS, GREGORY C DOZIER, DAVIS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
TREADWELL v. DOE
as 5:2017cv00397
Plaintiff:
DEANTHONY M TREADWELL
Defendant:
JOHN DOE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
SMITH v. GLASS et al
as 3:2017cv00066
Plaintiff:
FANANDEZ D SMITH
Defendant:
KEITH GLASS, SAM TREADWELL, ROBERTSON and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
