Cases 11 - 20 of 79
Thomas v. Kemp et al
as 1:2022cv01372
Plaintiff:
Albert Charles Thomas
Defendant:
Brian Kemp, Deborah Gonzalez, John W. Donnelly and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Blue et al v. State Board of Pardons and Paroles
as 1:2021cv03140
Plaintiff:
Kenneth Blue and Lester Blue
Defendant:
State Board of Pardons and Paroles
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Taylor v. The State of Georgia et al
as 1:2021cv02297
Respondent:
State Board of Pardons and Parole and The State of Georgia
Petitioner:
Daniel W. Taylor and Sheriff Patrick Labott
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Deal v. Georgia State Board of Pardons and Paroles et al
as 1:2021cv00181
Defendant:
Jacqueline Bunn, Brian Owens, Terry E. Bernard and others
Plaintiff:
Rodney Fitzgerald Deal
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Merilien v. State Board of Pardons and Paroles et al
as 1:2019cv05750
Respondent:
State Board of Pardons and Paroles and Milton Buddy Nix
Petitioner:
Jean Jocelyn Merilien
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Edwards v. State of Georgia et al
as 1:2019cv04101
Defendant:
Harold L. Murphy, William Foster, III, Janet King and others
Plaintiff:
Randy Edwards
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Danenberg v. Members of the Georgia Board of Pardons and Paroles
as 1:2019cv03912
Defendant:
Members of the Georgia Board of Pardons and Paroles
Plaintiff:
Robert Allen Danenberg
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2019cv01987
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 pr
MOORE v. WHITE et al
as 1:2019cv00847
Respondent:
Georgia Board of Pardons, Georgia Board of Pardons and Paroles, WARDEN JERMANE WHITE and others
Petitioner:
David Timothy Moore
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Edwards v. State of Georgia et al
as 4:2019cv00006
Respondent:
State Board of Pardons and Paroles and State of Georgia
Petitioner:
Randy Edwards
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
