Cases 21 - 30 of 132
Lawrence v. Movement Mortgage, LLC et al
as 1:2021cv04160
Plaintiff:
Sherrod Lawrence
Defendant:
Movement Mortgage, LLC, Casey S. Crawford, Laura M. Bowles and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1444
Bey v. Commonwealth of Massachusetts et al
as 1:2021cv03886
Plaintiff:
Jamil Rasul Bey
Defendant:
Commonwealth of Massachusetts, Massachusetts State Police-Medford, Ryan Casey and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 241
The Moorish Militia v. Commonwealth of Massachusetts et al
as 1:2021cv03887
Plaintiff:
The Moorish Militia
Defendant:
Commonwealth of Massachusetts, Massachusetts State Police-Medford, Ryan Casey and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 241
Libertad v. Commonwealth of Massachusetts et al
as 1:2021cv03888
Plaintiff:
Lucha El Por Libertad
Defendant:
Commonwealth of Massachusetts, Massachusetts State Police-Medford, Ryan Casey and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 241
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2021cv02023
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Sex)
Morrow v. Ethicon, Inc. et al
as 1:2021cv01939
Defendant:
Ethicon, Inc. and Johnson & Johnson
Plaintiff:
Casey Morrow
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Wood v. Frederick et al
as 1:2021cv01169
Defendant:
Casey Carter Santas, Brandon L. Peak, Christopher Sutton Connelly and others
Plaintiff:
L. Lin Wood, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
HOUSTON v. PEARCE et al
as 1:2021cv00253
Defendant:
A. W. Smith, John Doe, LIVISTON and others
Plaintiff:
ERIC HOUSTON
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
HOUSTON v. PEARCE et al
as 1:2021cv00022
Defendant:
A. W. Smith, John Doe, LIVISTON and others
Plaintiff:
ERIC HOUSTON
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Nelson et al v. United States of America et al
as 1:2020cv05083
Plaintiff:
Keanna Houston and Casey Nelson
Defendant:
United States of America and Sung Hee Kim
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
