Cases 81 - 90 of 348
Edwards v. State of Georgia et al
as 1:2019cv04101
Defendant:
Harold L. Murphy, William Foster, III, Janet King and others
Plaintiff:
Randy Edwards
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Carey et al v. The Georgia Department of Corrections et al
as 1:2019cv04630
Plaintiff:
Melissa Riley Carey and Wallace Riley
Defendant:
Dr. Sharon Lewis, Antoine Caldwell, The Georgia Department of Corrections and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2019cv00092
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Danglar v. State of Georgia et al
as 1:2019cv03537
Plaintiff:
Lyncoln Danglar
Defendant:
Commissioner Gregory C. Dozier, Ronnie Bynum, Warden Terrence Kilpatrick and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Edwards v. State of Georgia
as 1:2019cv03927
Respondent:
Core Civic, State of Georgia, Department of Corrections and others
Petitioner:
Randy Edwards
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Fletcher v. State of Georgia
as 1:2019cv03256
Plaintiff:
Christopher Jamal Fletcher
Defendant:
Georgia Department of Corrections and State of Georgia
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hewitt v. Georgia Department of Corrections et al
as 1:2019cv01336
Respondent:
Georgia Department of Corrections, Christopher Carr and Timothy C. Ward
Petitioner:
Carl Hewitt
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Purcell v. Warden Coleman et al
as 2:2019cv00092
Respondent:
Department of Corrections and Warden Coleman
Petitioner:
Jonathon Purcell
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Newell v. Georgia Department of Corrections et al
as 1:2019cv01422
Defendant:
Warden Telfair State Prison, Fulton County, Georgia Department of Corrections and others
Plaintiff:
Torrey Newell
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Reeves v. Commissioner of Georgia Department of Corrections
as 1:2019cv01978
Defendant:
Commissioner of Georgia Department of Corrections
Plaintiff:
David Reeves
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
