Cases 1 - 10 of 10
Patterson v. Bryan County Fire and Emergency Services et al
as 4:2023cv00225
Plaintiff:
Summer Patterson
Defendant:
Bryan County Fire and Emergency Services, Freddy Howell and Byran County, Georgia
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Boyd v. State of Georgia et al
as 4:2023cv00150
Plaintiff:
Davious M. Boyd
Defendant:
State of Georgia, Kendrick Clayton, Crystal Steele and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Boyd v. State of Georgia et al
as 5:2023cv00052
Plaintiff:
Davious M. Boyd
Defendant:
State of Georgia, Kendrick Clayton, Crystal Steele and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
SUMMERS v. PAGE et al
as 6:2022cv00051
Plaintiff:
Ebony Summers
Defendant:
Tracy Page, Georgia Department of Corrections and Department of O.S.H.A.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Bennet v. Ewing et al
as 2:2022cv00012
Plaintiff:
Summer Nicole Bennet
Defendant:
Cody Nelson Ewing and Quincy Wright
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Summers v. Carasas et al
as 4:2020cv00271
Defendant:
Luis Carasas and Rasier, LLC
Plaintiff:
Angela Summers
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2015cv00147
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
Summers v. Colvin
as 1:2013cv00180
Plaintiff:
Rosalie Summers
Defendant:
Carolyn W. Colvin
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Terrell v. Georgia Department of Corrections et al
as 3:2010cv00100
Plaintiff:
David T. Terrell, Sr.
Defendant:
Georgia Department of Corrections, Brian Owens, Jose Morales and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Lott v. Jackson et al
as 5:2008cv00016
Plaintiff:
Mack Henry Lott
Defendant:
Jackson, Cornell Corrections and Stock Holders, James Donald and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
