Cases 41 - 50 of 285
Sulzner v. Office of the Director of National Intelligence et al
as 1:2021cv00043
Defendant:
Beth Sanner, Trey Treadwell, Office of the Director of National Intelligence and others
Plaintiff:
Justin Paul Sulzner
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442
Huston v. Turner et al
as 5:2021cv04012
Defendant:
William Turner, Michael Dornack, Brad Wittrock and others
Plaintiff:
Paul Michael Huston
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Adam v. CHW Group, Inc
as 1:2021cv00019
Plaintiff:
William Adam
Defendant:
CHW Group, Inc doing business as Choice Home Warranty
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227
Young v. United States of America
as 5:2021cv04009
Petitioner:
Boulder Young
Respondent:
United States of America
Interested Party:
Sean William Pickett
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Smith v. Miller et al
as 1:2021cv00018
Defendant:
Mark Tremmel, Lance Miller and Alena Wolford
Plaintiff:
William Jesse Smith
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Smith v. United States of America
as 1:2021cv00015
Plaintiff:
William Smith
Defendant:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Hoffert v. Dalyrymple et al
as 6:2021cv02009
Defendant:
Unknown Deputy, Captain Neff, Judge Joel A. Dalyrymple and others
Plaintiff:
Roger Joseph Hoffert, Jr
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
McNealy v. United States of America
as 6:2020cv02102
Respondent:
United States of America
Petitioner:
William McNealy, Jr
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Christopherson et al v. Iowa, State of et al
as 1:2020cv00116
Plaintiff:
Tanor D Jimmison, Joseph Wegmann, Andrew Michael Simmons and others
Defendant:
Cedar Rapids, IA, City of, Iowa Supreme Court, Iowa, State of and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Holmes v. Gibbs
as 6:2020cv02071
Interested Party:
William A Hill
Petitioner:
Thomas D. Holmes and Thomas D Holmes
Respondent:
Randy Gibbs
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
