Cases 51 - 60 of 70
Grider et al v. Thomspon et al
as 6:2011cv02048
Plaintiff:
Tony Lewis Grider, Curtis Moore, Derrick Taylor and others
Defendant:
Tony Thomspon, Buck Clark, Superintendent of Black Hawk County Jail and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Grider v. Black Hawk County Attorney et al
as 6:2011cv02046
Plaintiff:
Tony Lewis Grider
Defendant:
Black Hawk County Attorney, Tony Thompson, Any and all unnamed persons and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Grider v. Shonka et al
as 6:2011cv02034
Plaintiff:
Tony L Grider
Defendant:
Jeff Shonka, Tony Thompson, Buck Clark and others
Intervenor_plaintiff:
Ricky Cains and Neal Joseph Moses
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Grider v. State of Iowa
as 6:2011cv02033
Plaintiff:
Tony L Grider
Defendant:
State of Iowa
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Hulstein v. Dodds et al
as 5:2011cv04039
Plaintiff:
Tony Hulstein
Defendant:
Zane Dodds, Chris Zangari, J D Underwood and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Barrett v. Ludwick
as 1:2011cv00045
Plaintiff:
Tonie Barrett
Defendant:
Nick Ludwick
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Goodson v. United States of America
as 1:2010cv00095
Plaintiff:
Tony Goodson
Defendant:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2010cv03071
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Hulstein v. Drug Enforcement Administration -- SEE #43 ORDER STAYING JUDGMENT, ALSO SET PRODUCTION DDL FOR 30 DAYS AFTER 8CC MANDATE--SEE #44 ORDER TO SET DDL FOR RESPONSE TO ATTY FEE MOTION 30 DAYS AFTER 8CC MANDATE
as 5:2010cv04112
Plaintiff:
Tony Hulstein
Defendant:
Drug Enforcement Administration
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 552 Freedom of Information Act
Hemsath v. Thompson
as 6:2010cv02061
Plaintiff:
Jeffrey Martin Hemsath
Defendant:
Tony Thompson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
