Cases 11 - 20 of 32
Hampton v. Osmumdson et al
as 1:2019cv01172
Defendant:
. Smith, . Miller, . Robinson and others
Plaintiff:
Demarco Hampton
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Parker v. Wexford Health Source Inc et al
as 4:2019cv04076
Defendant:
Jane Doe, Unknown Correctional Officers, Leonta Jackson and others
Plaintiff:
Johnathon P Parker
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Armstrong v. Watkins et al
as 1:2019cv01030
Defendant:
Matthew Ray, Jacob Beck, Daniel Duncan and others
Plaintiff:
Charles A. Armstrong
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Williams v. Brown et al
as 2:2018cv02319
Plaintiff:
Mary Ann Williams
Defendant:
. Rebekka, Tammy Brown and Brittany Armstrong
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Maxwell v. Dobier et al
as 4:2018cv04222
Plaintiff:
Jeremy Maxwell
Defendant:
N. Hernandez, Colehand, Taylor and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Feed Arts Inc et al v. Wells-Armstrong et al
as 2:2018cv02147
Plaintiff:
Feed Arts Incorporated , Kankakee Country Club , DDLJ Inc and others
Defendant:
Chasity Wells-Armstrong and City of Kankakee, Illinois
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Beckel et al v. Scott et al
as 4:2017cv04247
Plaintiff:
Andrew W Beckel and Allen M Barnard
Defendant:
Gregg Scott, Erik Kunkle, C Clayton and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Battrell et al v. Armstrong Flooring Inc
as 2:2017cv02150
Plaintiff:
Rockford Battrell and Abel Torres
Defendant:
Armstrong Flooring Inc
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Design Basics, LLC v. Armstrong Builders, Inc. et al
as 1:2016cv01186
Plaintiff:
Design Basics, LLC
Defendant:
Armstrong Builders, Inc., Armstrong Construction of Champaign, Inc., Armstrong Builders of Peoria, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1338
Armstrong v. Godinez et al
as 3:2016cv03086
Plaintiff:
Danny James Armstrong
Defendant:
S A Godinez, Jeff Korte, . Orr and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
