Cases 61 - 70 of 780
McCray v. WaterKotte et al
as 4:2023cv04015
Plaintiff:
Leonardo McCray
Defendant:
Cody Water Uotte, Shane Jumper, Gerald Carreon and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Custer v. Watkins et al
as 1:2022cv01472
Plaintiff:
John Custer
Defendant:
Chris Watkins, Brian Asbell, Camessa Turner and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Custer v. Smith et al
as 1:2022cv01462
Plaintiff:
John Custer
Defendant:
. Smith, . Sanders, . Cannon and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Smith v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 4:2022cv04184
Plaintiff:
Michael Smith
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Interested Party:
CSS-Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Payne v. Smith et al
as 1:2022cv01439
Plaintiff:
Kraig Payne
Defendant:
Smith, . McCarthy, Amanda M Dietz and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Johnson v. Zanger et al
as 3:2022cv03258
Plaintiff:
Sterling Johnson
Defendant:
Zanger, Smith, Ceaver and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hercmanas et al v. Pritzker et al
as 3:2022cv03254
Plaintiff:
Robert Hercmanas and Kacey Hanson
Defendant:
Jay R Pritzker, Illinois Department of Corrections (IDOC), Illinois Department of Human Services and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Payne et al v. Pritzker et al
as 3:2022cv03246
Plaintiff:
Brittany Payne, Peggy Johnston and Kelly Vera
Defendant:
Jay R Pritzker, Erin O'Boyle, Sarah Kerley and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Smith v. USA
as 1:2022cv01380
Petitioner:
Martez Smith
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Pizarro v. Smith et al
as 3:2022cv03233
Plaintiff:
Eddy Pizarro
Defendant:
. Smith, Eric Wolfeil and John Doe
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
