Cases 1 - 10 of 64
Johnston v. Eppstein et al
as 1:2024cv01051
Plaintiff:
Suzanne L Johnston
Defendant:
Jeffrey Eppstein, Zerla Properties, Mary Jo Papich and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Nelsrud v. Warden of Pekin FCI
as 1:2023cv01460
Petitioner:
Kelly Jo Nelsrud
Respondent:
Warden of Pekin FCI
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Dyjak v. Daniels et al
as 3:2023cv03170
Plaintiff:
Logan Dyjak
Defendant:
Harvey Daniels, Jo-an Lynn, Stacey Horstman and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Sanborn v. Mattoon Police Department et al
as 2:2022cv02182
Plaintiff:
Darren E Sanborn
Defendant:
Mattoon Police Department, Sam Gaines, Roboson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
United States of America v. Estate of Nancy Jo Abbey, Deceased et al
as 3:2022cv03114
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Defendant:
Estate of Nancy Jo Abbey, Deceased, Lucas Young, Nicole Brown and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1345 Foreclosure
Dyjak v. Reed et al
as 3:2022cv03020
Plaintiff:
Logan Dyjak
Defendant:
Corey Reed, Harvey Daniels, Tracey Rawlings and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Guthrie v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 1:2022cv01004
Plaintiff:
Deborah Jo Guthrie
Defendant:
Kilolo Kijakazi and Commissioner of Social Security
Interested Party:
CSS-Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Dyjak v. Walker et al
as 3:2021cv03249
Plaintiff:
Logan Dyjak
Defendant:
Damion Walker, Sara Broyles, Lana Miller and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Dyjak v. Horstman et al
as 3:2021cv03151
Plaintiff:
Logan Dyjak
Defendant:
Stacey Horstman, Jo-an Lynn and Lana Miller
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Foster v. Champaign County et al
as 2:2021cv02047
Defendant:
Champaign County and Laurel Prussing
Plaintiff:
Amy Jo Foster
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2601
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
