Cases 1 - 10 of 18
Dawson v. Kolitwenzew et al
as 2:2022cv02226
Plaintiff:
Fyance Dawson
Defendant:
Chad Kolitwenzew, Robert Schultz, Schultz and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Santiago v. Adkins et al
as 2:2022cv02231
Plaintiff:
William Santiago
Defendant:
Felicia Adkins, Rob Jeffreys, J Ek and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Santiago v. Matherly et al
as 1:2022cv01199
Plaintiff:
Fabian Santiago
Defendant:
Martin L Matherly, Jamar A Range, Stephanie Dorethy and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Glover et al v. Illinois Department of Corrections et al
as 2:2018cv02270
Defendant:
Illinois Department of Corrections, Wexford Corp, Steve Meeks and others
Plaintiff:
Michael Glover, Curtis A Clark, Danny Lillard and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hurtado-Meza v. Kolitwenzew et al
as 2:2021cv02178
Plaintiff:
Mario Hurtado-Meza
Defendant:
Chad Kolitwenzew, . Woods, Nick .. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Smart v. Santiago et al
as 2:2021cv02137
Plaintiff:
Elliott Smart
Defendant:
Alicia Vasquez, Deliz Santiago and Shannon Haggard
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Guijosa-Maya v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 1:2021cv01128
Plaintiff:
Santiago Guijosa-Maya
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Interested Party:
CSS-Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2020cv02166
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1801
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2019cv02354
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e
Vera-Ortegon v. Rettenmier et al
as 3:2018cv03321
Defendant:
Rettenmier, Nurse Jane Doe 2, Tara Goins and others
Plaintiff:
Santiago Vera-Ortegon
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
