Cases 1 - 10 of 70
Hill v. Wolfe et al
as 2:2024cv02126
Plaintiff:
Demetrius G Hill
Defendant:
Julie Moore Wolfe, City of Decatur Illinois, Jim Root and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Grason v. City of Decatur et al
as 2:2023cv02130
Plaintiff:
MD Ronald J Grason and Ronald J Grason
Defendant:
City of Decatur and Julie Moore Wolfe
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Hervey v. Lief et al
as 4:2023cv04092
Plaintiff:
Ronnie Hervey
Defendant:
R Lief, Tyler Crouse, Stephanie Dorethy and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
James v City of Urbana et al
as 2:2023cv02115
Plaintiff:
LeShawn James
Defendant:
City of Urbana, Diane Wolfe Marlin, Demond Dade and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2601 Family and Medical Leave Act
Calhoun v. Hester et al
as 3:2023cv03167
Plaintiff:
Cory William Calhoun
Defendant:
Sue Hester, Brian Curran, Jane Doe and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Gonzalez v. Wolf et al
as 2:2023cv02012
Plaintiff:
Manuel Gonzalez
Defendant:
Terry Gordon Wolf and Caledonia Haulers LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal- Auto Negligence
Wolf v. USA
as 3:2021cv03256
Petitioner:
Field Wolf
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Wolf v. USA
as 3:2021cv03234
Petitioner:
Field Wolf
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Reardon v. Danley et al
as 2:2021cv02260
Plaintiff:
Todd Michael Reardon and Todd Michael Reardon, Sr
Defendant:
Jesse Danley, Joy Wolf, Jason Taylor and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Wolfe et al v. Coles County States Attorneys Office et al
as 2:2021cv02206
Plaintiff:
Mervin Wolfe, Taylor Schoeneman and Anthony Golding
Defendant:
Coles County State's Attorney's Office, Coles County Illinois Board, Illinois Office of the State's Attorney's Appellate Prosecutor and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
